----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Lesley Groff <[email protected]>
To: J. Epstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2007 9:42:39 AM
Subject: FW: Munich


DLD: Jan 21-23, Munich

What is DLD?
DLD (Digital, Life, Design) is one of Europe's freshest conferences covering digital innovation, gaming, arts and science, bringing together thought leaders from Europe, the Middle-East, America and Asia. The next DLD will take place at HVB Forum in the center of Munich, Germany. Mark these days in your calendar: January 21st - 23rd, 2007

DLD07 Topics
We will talk about changes in markets, society and personal lifestyle caused by the next decade's central fields of innovation. So, topics of DLD07 are, amongst others:

Europe’s new supercollider
Gutenberg 2.0 - perspectives for media companies
The future of marketing: communities & brand spaces
Focus Internet: Search, social networks, gaming & broadband
Media without editors
Wireless revolution & telcos response
Art & Design - the new modernity
Architecture and the city of the future
Climate Change as entrepreneurial challenge
Topics will be discussed throughout a 2.5 days program at panels, presentations and workshop sessions. Just check back regularly for any upcoming information. A detailed program will be published soon.

http://www.dld-conference.com/

Some speakers:  Norman Foster, Niklas Zennstrom, Marissa Mayer, Linda Stone, Dan Dubno, Hubert Burda, Yossi Vardi, Beth Comstock, Chris Bangle, David de Rothschild, etc.

From Steffi yesterday:

bythwy: what about the idea to bring Jeffrey, John and of course Ghislaine  ?
We would love to have them!!!
What do you think, should we send personal invitations from Hubert and Yossi ?
looking forward to see you sooon


LHC Visit: Jan 29, Geneva

I am arranging for a few of us to visit the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, a 27-km circumflex spanning the French and Swiss borders. We will meet Brian Cox, one of the lead scientists on the main ATLAS experiment, and other scientists. The tunnel is off-limits in a couple of months when they turn on the magnets so now we’ll be able to actually go into the tunnel and see the world’s most powerful supercollider under construction....

The LHC is a circular tunnel 27 km around, bisected by the Franco-Swiss border. Over 100-billion protons will traverse its pathways at near-light speed, guided by some 9,300 superconducting magnets, each weighing several tons and chilled to temperatures colder than deep space. At four points in the tunnels, the counter-revolving protons are to smash into one another at a rate of nearly one billion per second.

At the crossing points, huge detectors are in place to register the tiny wisps of debris that emerge from each of the collisions. One of these instruments has enough iron to re-construct the Eiffel Tower; another is two-and-a-half times larger than the Parthenon and taller than the Colossus of Rhodes. Information from these subatomic traffic accidents will be sped around the globe on the largest computer grid in existence—the nervous system for all the brains that will struggle to make sense of the myriad data. All these superlatives exist for one reason: To understand the universe.


Discovery for the Sake of Discovery
Lawrence Krauss, Seed

On a summer day, you can ride your bicycle through the narrow lanes that bisect fields of grass on the outskirts of Geneva with no thought that, dozens of meters below, one of the most complex construction projects in human history is underway. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), just one year from completion at CERN, will be the most powerful particle accelerator ever constructed, the largest and most technologically sophisticated machine ever built, and one of the greatest scientific endeavors humanity has yet undertaken.

The late Austrian-American physicist Victor Weisskopf described the grand particle accelerators that began to take shape around the world in the 1950's and 60's as the "Gothic cathedrals of the 20th century." The comparison was, and is, apt. The medieval cathedrals pushed the limits of available technology, involved the craftsmanship of literally thousands of skilled workers, and took generations (and sometimes centuries) to complete. Modern particle accelerators require decades from conception to completion and involve scientists from about 80 countries, speaking dozens of languages, whose separate handiwork must mesh together perfectly on the scale of thousandths of millimeters. The physical magnitude of these distinct public works projects is similarly comparable—just one of the LHC's four detectors is large enough to house the Notre Dame Cathedral.

But the true comparison that probably drove Weisskopf to make his claim is more subtle. Cathedrals were designed to celebrate the glory of God as manifested through the human spirit in words, music and art. The LHC has been engineered to celebrate and proclaim the glory of the natural world, and of our remarkable ability to comprehend it, as manifested through experimental science. It will probe the structure of matter on scales 10 billion times smaller than anything "nano," creating fleeting elementary particles that, since the Big Bang, have existed almost exclusively in the imagination of theoretical physicists. The issues it will seek to address range from the origin of mass to the origin of matter; from surpassing the near-complete Standard Model of physics, that precisely governs particle interactions on a subatomic scale, to unveiling the very fundamental mathematical symmetries that guide the structure and makeup of the natural world.

Weisskopf's comparison is also worth reflecting upon as we recall that Gothic Cathedrals, like their modern counterparts, strained the purse strings of the communities where they were built. The LHC's cost will exceed $8 billion. In a practical world, particularly one in which government deficits and basic human needs abound, one may reasonably ask whether such public largesse can be afforded to such a minority of special interest, particle physicists.

One argument is that the cost of the LHC, built as part of an international collaboration over a decade, pales in comparison to the cost of other government outlays, including maintaining the war in Iraq for a few months. But it is disingenuous to compare apples and oranges in this way. The real question is whether we as a culture can afford not to pursue the questions about the universe that have baffled us for millennia, especially now that we may have the capability to discern the answers. Science is often celebrated as the source of technology, but I believe that celebration is misplaced. Science is a vital part of our culture. Like any lasting piece of art, music or literature, it compels us to reassess our place in the universe—to question where we come from, and where we are going. To turn our back on these questions is to dismiss our cultural inheritance.

Indeed, when Robert Wilson, the first director of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory near Chicago was summoned before a US House of Representatives committee to justify the exorbitant cost of his accelerator, he was asked whether it would aid in the defense of the nation. He answered, "It has nothing to do directly with defending our country, except to make it worth defending."

High school students today do not study the plumbing of the ancient Greeks, but we hope they still marvel at the elegance of Plato and Socrates. When we think of the great civilizations that have come before us, we associate their greatness with the ideas that drove their culture forward. We remember their efforts to confront the mysteries of the natural world, from the astronomy of the Chinese to the mathematics of the Arab masters, to the natural philosophy of ancient Greece and Rome. The Large Hadron Collider, and the discoveries it may make, are a part of our legacy for future generations.

Will the LHC live up to our hopes? The particle physics community has every reason to believe new discoveries will be made at the LHC to reinvigorate a field that has, for too long, been starved of data that might point beyond the Standard Model. Major discoveries—ranging from the observation of new "superpartners" of ordinary particles, to new forces and the more exotic possible disappearance of energy into hypothesized extra dimensions—tease the imaginations of theorists. But it could also be that the hoped-for new phenomena may elude us; indeed, they may not exist. As unfavorable as this might appear to be for the prospects of a new generation of accelerators, even this worst case will teach us something of fundamental importance about nature. Indeed, a lack of new phenomena may be the most unexpected and exciting discovery of all. We have nothing to lose. Null experiments may not be as exciting as positive discoveries, but they can change a field. (One need only recall the Michelson-Morley experiment, whose failure to detect the aether helped pave the way for Einstein's Theory of Relativity). The LHC could tell us that the machinations that have occupied particle theorists for the past two decades, and have been source material for books and television shows, may have been misplaced—to be supplanted by even more exciting ideas yet to be born.

The effort to understand the natural world is not a humble enterprise, and neither should it be. It represents the very best of what we celebrate about being human, and provides the otherwise unimaginable insights that illuminate our brief existence here on this lonely planet. The LHC is the next immodest step in the noble tradition of unlocking the mysteries of the heavens, seeking to capture their haunting grandeur while firmly on the ground. That is its ultimate justification. The shared motivation and hubris that have propelled us from Galileo's first sight of Jupiter's moons, to the Hubble Space Telescope's intimate vision of deep space, are its impetus, and it is this intellectual endeavor--to explore the unknown possibilities of existence—that justifies pushing hard at the edges of our knowledge and ultimately defines what we call civilization.



Atlas (100 km underground)





On 1/4/07 8:41 AM, "Lesley Groff" <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello Adam.  The following is Jeffrey's response:

posssible send details
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lesley Groff
Executive Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein

 

---

From: Adam Bly [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 5:02 PM
To: Lesley Groff
Subject: Munich

Lesley,

Could you please forward this to Jeffrey...

Thanks,
Adam

---

Jeffrey,

Hubert Burda and Steffi Czerny asked me to extend you an invitation to come to DLD in Munich January 21-23. DLD is becoming the new TED. I went last year, and will go back this year and present. It is on the Sunday-Tuesday before Davos. Steffi said she will have Hubert and Yossi Vardi send you something as well. Are you interested in coming?

Also... after Davos I am going for the day (Jan 29) to see the new Large Hadron Collider at CERN (goes online end of the year and the tunnel will soon be off-limits) with some of the scientists there and Paola Antonelli, the curator of design at MoMA. Are you interested in coming?

Adam